Tell us about your case
Tell us about your case
Your Full Name
Your Phone Number
Your E-mail
Select Law Category
Describe your case
Attention Attorneys!
Get Listed in this directory for only
$199/yr
Call 1-800-414-5025 to speak to a web marketing expert
More Info

Little Rock, Arkansas Employment Attorneys

Employment Attorneys »
Philip E. Kaplan
111 Center Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
(501) 372-0800
Labor and Employment law
Visit the profile page of Philip E. Kaplan Email Philip E. KaplanVisit Philip E. Kaplan on on the web
  

Other Little Rock Employment Attorneys

Rose Law Firm
120 East Fourth Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 375-9131
Almand Orsi & Campbell PLLC
211 Natural Resources Dr
Little Rock, AR 72205
(501) 219-8500
Almefty Kynda
425 West Capitol Avenue Suite 180...
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 688-8899
Ball & Stuart
415 N Mckinley St Ste 310
Little Rock, AR 72205
(501) 687-9000
Bequette & Billingsley
425 W Capitol Ave
Little Rock, AR 72201
(888) 373-1002
Bequette & Billingsley
425 West Capitol Avenue Suite 32...
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 374-1107
Buzbee & Hawk
300 Spring Street Suite 1004
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 376-3418
Calhoun Law Firm
425 West Capitol Avenue Suite 34...
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 374-1700
Carney Williams Bates Bozeman & Pulliam PLLC
11311 Arcade Drive Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72212
(501) 312-8500
Brandon Cate
111 Center Street Suite 1900
Little Rock, AR 72201
(479) 444-5200
Chisenhall, Nestrud & Julian, P.A.
400 W. Capitol Ave.
Suite 2840
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 372-5800
David P Rawls
500 Pleasant Valley Dr C,
Little Rock, AR 72227
(501) 221-0444
James Dowden
212 Center Street Tenth Floor
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 324-4700
Scott Fletcher
1008 West Second Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 907-7600
Gary P Barket
8201 Cantrell Road
Little Rock, AR 72227
(501) 217-0400
Gill Ragon Owen, P.A.
425 West Capitol Avenue
Suite 3801
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 376-3800
Hyneman Ginger Clem
111 Center Street Suite 1900
Little Rock, AR 72201
(870) 931-1701
James Carter Coulter, P.L.C.
500 Broadway
Little Rock, AR 72203
(866) 716-3242
Wallace, Martin, Duke & Russell, PLLC
1st Floor, Centre Place 212 Center Street
Suite 100
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 375-5545
Jewell Law Firm
57 Laval Circle
Little Rock, AR 72223
(501) 868-4144
Lavey & Burnett
904 W 2nd St Ste 2
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 376-2269
Madden Law Firm
515 Rock St
Little Rock, AR 72202
(501) 378-7700
Mason Clark
1501 N University Ave,
Little Rock, AR 72207
(501) 219-0077
Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard PLLC
425 West Capitol Avenue Suite 18...
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 688-8800

About Little Rock Employment Attorneys

Little Rock Employment Attorneys assist both employees and employers with issues related to labour and employment, including the following:

  • Work Permits
  • Employment Equity
  • Workers Compensation
  • Wrongful Dismissal
  • Union Certification
  • Sexual Harassment

The following types of attorneys are included in the Employment Attorneys category:

Wrongful Dismissal Attorneys

Wrongful Dismissal Attorneys deal with the specific area of Employment Law related to wrongful dismissal. Wrongful dismissal involves cases where an employee has been fired unfairly, unreasonably, or without just cause. Wrongful Dismissal cases form a large portion of the caseload for many Employment Attorneys. Our directory includes Wrongful Dismissal attorneys within the category of Employment Attorneys.

Related Categories

Civil Litigation

Many aspects of Employment Law, such as Wrongful Dismissal, involve specific fields of Civil Litigation in which many attorneys specialize. In geographic areas where there are no specific Wrongful Dismissal or Employment Attorneys, a Civil Litigation attorney is generally utilized for these cases.

Little Rock, AR Employment Attorney News

Uncertain Future for Virginia's Minority and Women-Owned Transportation Businesses Amid Federal Changes

Virginia's minority- and women-owned businesses in the transportation sector are facing significant challenges due to changes in federal regulations. The recent decision by the U.S. Department of Transportation to eliminate the set-aside program for disadvantaged business enterprises (DBEs) has raised alarms among local advocates, including Joanne Payne, president of Women First. This shift could threaten years of progress in creating equitable employment opportunities in the state.

Concerns have been echoed by Babur Mian, a representative from Virginia’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Transportation Association. He highlighted the ineffective response from the Virginia Department of Transportation regarding these changes, which are halting the participation of DBEs in transportation projects.

With the reauthorization of the DBE program in jeopardy and a court trial scheduled for January, advocates warn that inaction could hinder economic growth and limit accessibility for businesses throughout the Commonwealth. Stakeholders are urging Congress to take decisive steps to preserve initiatives that support diverse business ownership and stimulate local economic development.

Virginia Families Need $84K for One Partner to Stay Home, Study Finds

A recent study reveals that single parents in Richmond, Virginia, need to earn at least $84,261 to support a stay-at-home partner while raising a young child. This financial requirement places Virginia 14th among all states, shedding light on the economic challenges faced by families, especially those dealing with divorce and family law issues.

The research indicates that dual-income households in Virginia must bring in a minimum of $98,176 just to cover basic living expenses, which includes planning for wills and estates. This underscores the significant impact that raising children has on employment and financial stability.

Interestingly, states like West Virginia and Arkansas have lower living costs, making them more attractive for families contemplating a structure that allows for a stay-at-home parent. The findings highlight ongoing challenges for parents navigating the complexities of family law in Virginia.

Georgia GOP Bill Sparks Outcry as Millions Face SNAP Benefit Cuts Due to Cost-Sharing Changes

A recent nonpartisan analysis indicates that a newly approved Republican tax and spending bill may result in the loss of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for 3.2 million individuals, significantly affecting vulnerable communities throughout Georgia.

Key figures opposing the legislation, including Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Rep. Angie Craig, express concern that the bill favors tax cuts for the wealthy over vital food assistance for struggling families. This sentiment highlights a growing divide in Washington over fiscal priorities.

The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the provisions within the bill could impose nearly $14 billion in annual costs on states. This raises alarms about potential impacts on state budgets and employment support systems which are crucial for many families.

Advocates, including local business leaders and Georgia lawmakers, emphasize the importance of safeguarding programs that benefit working-class residents. As the Senate gears up for discussions, the potential ramifications on real estate law and job opportunities add further layers to the ongoing debate about financial assistance in the Peach State.

Trump Administration's IVF Plan Draws Criticism from Oregon Fertility Advocates

Following President Trump's recent executive order aimed at enhancing access to in vitro fertilization (IVF), several key leaders in reproductive health are raising concerns. Sean Tipton from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Barbara Collura of Resolve: The National Infertility Association have both expressed disappointment regarding the lack of consultation with crucial stakeholders in the process.

Advocates are particularly worried about the proposed policies, which may overlook essential coverage for servicemembers and veterans in Oregon, where access to reproductive healthcare is of utmost importance. There is growing apprehension regarding the emphasis on alternative methods like "restorative reproductive medicine." These leaders argue that such a shift could potentially obstruct vital IVF treatments, jeopardizing the reproductive aspirations of many individuals and couples.

Critics are sounding alarms about the implications of delaying IVF coverage. They fear that without timely access, prospective parents might be forced to pursue less effective treatments, which could further complicate family planning efforts. As lawmakers in Oregon engage in debates about the future of healthcare policy, the push for comprehensive insurance mandates on IVF emerges as an urgent issue amid the changing political landscape.

"Chicago Residents Face Changes to Social Security Direct Deposit and Identity Verification"

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is introducing new identity verification measures that will impact millions, including residents of Chicago. Beginning March 31, individuals will need to visit SSA offices in person to verify their identities. This initiative is designed to tackle over $100 million in direct deposit fraud, according to Leland Dudek, the acting commissioner of the SSA.

Critics, such as Connecticut Rep. John Larson, are voicing concerns that these changes may disproportionately affect older Americans and people with disabilities, particularly those living in rural areas. They argue that requiring in-person visits can lead to unnecessary inconvenience for these vulnerable groups.

In addition to this measure, the SSA has streamlined its process for direct deposit change requests, now requiring only one business day to complete these instead of the previous hold period of 30 days.

As Chicago residents prepare for these changes, legal experts in employment and elder law are advising clients on how this might affect estate planning and benefits management.

United States Employment Attorney News

UChicago Press Workers Fight for Union Status Amid Chicago Labor Dispute Vote

UChicago Press workers are preparing for a critical union election overseen by the NLRB after management refused voluntary recognition. This ongoing labor dispute over fundamental worker rights pits the UCP Workers Guild, which is affiliated with the Chicago News Guild, against corporate leadership.

The stakes are high for this employment action in Chicago academia. Production specialist Sierra Wilson confirmed that a stipulated NLRB election agreement has been reached for the staff, setting the stage for mandatory bargaining should the union win its vote.

This conflict highlights deep-seated tensions between workers and corporate management. A successful union push would formalize dispute resolution methods, significantly impacting future institutional agreements across Chicago’s academic sector.

NOLA Goes Digital: How New QR Code Inspection System is Changing Vehicle Safety Laws

State modernization is reshaping vehicle inspections by replacing physical tags with advanced QR codes, a shift supported by leaders like Sen. Jay Luneau. While this technological leap introduces complexities related to state law and IP & Technology Law, it raises immediate questions about local employment within New Orleans' surrounding communities. For inspectors like David Minton in Metairie, the change presents real concerns about job security as technology advances.

Despite the modernization push, local enforcement authority remains critical in areas like Kenner. This transition impacts established processes, including how agencies handle traffic tickets. The new QR code system changes core safety standards and requires state law updates to manage everything from identification protocols to immediate field operations for those involved with day-to-day employment within the industry.

Utah Justice Resignation Sparks Major Ethics Debate Across the Texas Legal System

Utah Supreme Court Justice Diana Hagen's resignation, following a probe involving attorney David Reymann, has ignited a major debate regarding professional ethics and the blurry lines between private conduct and public trust.

This controversy immediately raises significant questions about maintaining ethical standards in the face of alleged misconduct. The issues highlighted here reflect the high stakes involved in various fields, from complex matters of 'Civil Litigation' to sensitive areas like 'Divorce and Family' law.

The incident draws powerful parallels to challenges faced across Texas, underscoring the need for meticulous oversight in 'Employment' and professional integrity. Governor Spencer Cox now faces the crucial task of selecting Hagen's replacement, adding political weight to the already tense situation. The entire episode serves as a strong reminder that full transparency is paramount, whether in Utah or throughout Texas.

Cal Fire Under Scrutiny: Lawsuit Challenges Agency's Employment Practices in Riverside

Cal Fire employee David Renteria now faces felony charges in Riverside County following allegations of assault in Temecula. A legal challenge has already been launched through civil litigation by the alleged victim, specifically targeting the agency's procedures regarding employee supervision and oversight.

Attorney David Ring is set to challenge the department’s practices, planning to expose systemic failures that raise serious questions about workplace accountability across California. This high-profile case underscores critical issues of misconduct within large California agencies.

Furthermore, the incident is intertwined with ongoing criminal defense proceedings managed by prosecutors, adding layers of complexity to the legal battle.

Chino Hills Assembly Battles Over Education Policy and School Board Power

A recent, controversial assembly in Chino Hills, California, has ignited intense debate about local politics and the influence of external groups. Parents, including Debra Esquivel, voiced serious grievances that could potentially escalate into matters of civil litigation.

The event sharply highlighted the delicate balance between educational curricula and powerful corporate interests, stirring discussions around professional preparation and the future of local employment. Officials such as Sonja Shaw managed complex discussions regarding students' perceived professional roles, while speakers like Katharine Gorka addressed civic education fundamentals. The resulting tensions underscore ongoing conflicts over local governance and how business and corporate narratives intersect with public education.