Tell us about your case
Tell us about your case
Your Full Name
Your Phone Number
Your E-mail
Select Law Category
Describe your case
Attention Attorneys!
Get Listed in this directory for only
$199/yr
Call 1-800-414-5025 to speak to a web marketing expert
More Info

Charleston, South Carolina Criminal Attorneys

215 East Bay Street
Suite 405

Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 722-7722
W. David Johnson - Criminal and Personal Injury Attorney
Visit the profile page of The Johnson Law Offices, LLC Email The Johnson Law Offices, LLCVisit The Johnson Law Offices, LLC on on the web
  

Other Charleston Criminal Defense Attorneys

Adriane M Belton
5 Exchange St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 720-4620
Bluestein Johnson & Burke
1 Carriage Ln Ste F3
Charleston, SC 29407
(843) 571-7161
Bruce E Miller
171 Church Street # 160
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 579-7373
Buist Moore
5 Exchange St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 720-4613
Buist Moore
5 Exchange St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 937-5293
Charles M Jordan
40 Calhoun St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 579-7030
Charleston Defense
391 Meeting St
Charleston, SC 29403
(888) 649-7936
Clekis Law Firm
8731 Northpark Blvd Ste C
Charleston, SC 29406
(843) 569-3004
Coleman Law Firm
1736 Wappoo Rd,
Charleston, SC 29407
(888) 851-4034
David Cox
Five Exchange Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 720-4665
David Crawford
Five Exchange Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 722-3400
Cynthia Jor Lowery
40 Calhoun St Ste 300
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 579-7023
David R Lawson
1 Carriage Ln # 1d
Charleston, SC 29407
(843) 224-4759
Detreville Law Firm
714 Saint Andrews Blvd
Charleston, SC 29407
(843) 571-0537
E Bart Daniel
Seven State Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 722-2000
Felix C Pelzer
40 Calhoun St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 579-7080
Gedney M Howe III
8 Chalmers Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 722-8048
George A Finnan
145 King Street Suite 309
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 725-0245
Gibbs & Holmes
171 Church Street Suite 110
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 722-0033
Gregg Meyers
PO Box 1297
Charleston, SC 29402
(843) 720-8714
Gregory S Forman
171 Church Street
Suite 160
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 720-3749
Hines J H
5 Exchange St
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 720-4656
Howe & Wyndham
47 State Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 853-6121
Joe Griffith
7 State Street
Charleston, SC 29401
(843) 225-5563

About Charleston Criminal Defense Attorneys

Charleston Criminal Defense Attorneys represent clients who have been charged with a criminal offense under the US Criminal Code, or with various State offenses.

Some of the offenses that criminal attorneys deal with include:

  • Young Offender cases
  • Weapons Offenses
  • Theft
  • Robbery
  • Impaired Driving
  • Domestic Assault, Sexual Assault
  • Drug Related Offenses
  • Murder / Homicide / Manslaughter
  • Fraud
  • Internet Related Charges
  • Break & Enter

Related Categories

Impaired Driving Defense Attorneys

Driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol is a criminal offense, and most Criminal attorneys will take on cases that involve impaired driving charges. We have created an additional category to for Impaired Driving attorneys since a great number of attorneys specialize in the area of Impaired Driving, and also due to the fact that most individuals who have been charged with an impaired driving offense would search for an Impaired Driving attorney and not a criminal attorney.

United States Criminal Defense Attorney News

No bail for man who knocked down a 79YO black man

The bail application of Conrad Barret, who is charged with a hate crime, was denied, something that Barret's lawyer said they have been expecting.

Houston criminal attorney George Parnham said that according to the judge, his 27-year-old client might avoid a criminal conviction. He also poses as a danger to the public.

Barret was charged after he attacked an old, black man; filmed the act and showed it to someone, who turned out to be an arson investigator.

Barrett is looking at more than a 10-year prison term and a fine of more than $200,000 should he get convicted.

Famous dealer of wine convicted for fraud

The jury returned a guilty verdict against Rudy Kurniawan, a star wine collector, for faking vintage wines, which he apparently just manufactured from his home.

Kurniawan was convicted for fraud and is looking at a massive 40-year sentence.

Kurniawan was once known as among the top five collectors of wine in the world.

Prosecutors accused Kurniawan of earning millions from selling and auctioning fake vintage wines.

Found in the home that Kurniawan shared with his mother were unlabeled bottles and labels of Burgundy and Bordeaux wines.

Suspicions against Kurniawan started during an auction in 2008 wherein he offered to sell Domaine Ponsot wines.

But it wasn't until a 2012 wine auction in London that Kurniawan was arrested.

Los Angeles criminal lawyer Jerome Mooney, defending for Kurniawan, said his client was not trying to defraud people. Instead, all he wanted was to belong.

NFL player's non-cooperation sees theft charges dropped against woman who stole his jewelry

Theft charges against Subhanna Beyah were dropped after her victim, New York Giants' Shaun Rogers, refused to cooperate with the authorities.

Jonathan Meltz, Beyah's lawyer in Miami, could not be contacted to comment on the issue.

Miami prosecutors believed that Beyah did to Rogers what she did to two other men, wherein she drugged them before stealing their valuables.

According to the police, Rogers had met Beyah at the nightclub of the hotel where he was staying.

Together with another couple, they had gone up to his room where he went to sleep while the others were partying. Before he went to sleep, he put his jewelry inside a safe in the room. When he woke up, Beyah was already gone and so was his jewelry worth almost $500,000.

Rogers had told the prosecution that he was not willing to cooperate during the one time he spoke with them.

Despite the failure of the theft charges to prosper, the prosecution instead will go ahead with charging Beyah for violating her probation wherein she is looking at a 20-year prison sentence if convicted.

Former prosecutor sentenced to 10 days for wrongful conviction

Ken Anderson, the former District Attorney of Williamson County, was meted with a 10-day jail term after the judge accepted his no-contest plea for the charge of contempt of court.

The charge steamed from the wrongful conviction of Michael Morton who was found guilty for the murder of his wife in 1986 and was sentenced to life imprisonment.

However, in 2011, Morton's conviction was overturned using DNA as proof that he did not kill his wife.

In the light of that development, Anderson, who had prosecuted Morton's case, was scrutinized and was determined to have erred when he withheld evidence which would have been beneficial for Morton's defense.

Aside from the short jail stay, Anderson will also have to give up his license as a lawyer and as part of the plea bargain, he will also be disbarred for five years.

Austin attorney Eric Nichols, however, pointed out that there will be no conviction for Anderson on any criminal charge.

Morton, for his part, said he is more than happy with the result because all he wanted was for Anderson not to practice law anymore to prevent what happened to him from happening to anyone else again.

Anderson was also fined and made to do community service.

Former deputy gets five years for punching teenager

David Morrow, who used to be the deputy of the Adams County, has been handed a five-year prison sentence for punching a teenager who was strapped to a gurney.

Morrow said he was sorry that the teenager was hurt because of what he did.

The teenager was causing a disturbance to which Morrow and other police officers have responded.

The police decided to take the teenager to the hospital because he was intoxicated and was being belligerent.

However, while he was strapped to a gurney, Morrow had hit the teenager in the face with his fist.

The sentence may still change as the judge had agreed to schedule another hearing to re-assess Morrow's sentence.

Donald Sisson, a defense attorney in Denver, said the case was not a usual one and thus Morrow's sentence should be re-evaluated.